Warm-up · Part A
(a) If and , find , , .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
, , . A pattern: .
Why
Apply the rule repeatedly: , , . These equal , , .
(b) Differentiate , then differentiate the answer again.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
, then . A pattern: .
Why
Product rule: . Again: .
(c) Write and in terms of and .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
and .
Why
These are the double angle formulas. The three forms of come from .
(d) Show that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Put in : , so .
Why
Parts (a), (b) and (d) are all used later in the lesson.
Recursive sequences
Definition
Proving a formula for a recursively defined sequenceA sequence is defined recursively when each term is given in terms of earlier terms, for example , .
To prove a formula for : check ; assume the formula for ; then substitute it into the recursion to get .
Example 1
Prove by induction that if and , then for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Let be the statement .
Step 1. : , so is true.
Step 2. Assume : for some integer .
Step 3. So is true when is true.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 1. : , so is true.
Step 2. Assume : for some integer .
Step 3. So is true when is true.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
The assumption is used inside the recursion: replace in by the assumed formula. This differs from series, where you add a term to the assumed sum.
Example 2 · A recursive fraction
Example 2
A sequence is defined by and . Find , , , make a conjecture for , and prove it by induction.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
, , . Conjecture: .
Step 1. .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 1. .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Conjecture first from the pattern, then prove it: this is the reasoning and communication the syllabus asks for. In Step 3, multiply top and bottom of the complex fraction by .
HSC practice · A nested square root
2022 HSC Q13(b)The sequence is defined by and for . Prove by induction that for all integers . You may use for (warm-up (d)).
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : , so is true.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. taking the positive root since , so the cosine is positive.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. taking the positive root since , so the cosine is positive.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Use the given identity with , which lies in . Then . The positive square root must be justified: only because . (Wording adapted from the paper.)
Example 3 · Calculus and trigonometry
Example 3
(a) Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
The th derivative is the derivative of the th derivative. Use the product rule on , treating as a constant.
(b) Prove by induction that, for , .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : .
Step 2. Assume the product up to equals for some integer .
Step 3. Multiply by :
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume the product up to equals for some integer .
Step 3. Multiply by :
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
The th product is the th product times one new factor, . The double angle formula with gives .
HSC practice · A trigonometric sum
2019 HSC Q14(c)(i) Show that .
(ii) Hence prove by induction that for all integers ,
(ii) Hence prove by induction that for all integers ,
Show answerHide answer
Answer
(i) (ii) Step 1. : by (i).
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Add , which is (i) with replaced by :
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Add , which is (i) with replaced by :
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
In (i), makes the numerator , and . The key idea in (ii) is “(i) with replaced by ”, which students often miss. (Cosec is written csc here; both are fine. Wording adapted from the paper.)
Spot the flaw · What’s missing?
A student wrote this. Find the flaw, explain why it matters, then write a correct version.
Student’s claim
If and , then for all .
- : . Assume .
- .
- Hence true for all by induction. □
Spot the flawWhat is missing from this proof, and why would a marker deduct for it?
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Nothing written is false, but three things are missing.
1. The step (from , with ) is not shown.
2. , so we must justify . This is true because for .
3. There is no conclusion naming and the start value: “ is true, and , so is true for all by induction.”
1. The step (from , with ) is not shown.
2. , so we must justify . This is true because for .
3. There is no conclusion naming and the start value: “ is true, and , so is true for all by induction.”
Why
Compare the 2022 HSC question earlier in this lesson, which has the same structure with . In an induction proof every step must be justified, in particular the choice of the positive square root, and the conclusion must be stated.
Warm-up · Part B
A fresh start for the second half of the lesson.
(a) Evaluate and . What do you notice?
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
This is Pascal’s identity: .
(b) Expand using Pascal’s triangle.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
The row of Pascal’s triangle 1, 4, 6, 4, 1 gives the coefficients.
(c) Simplify as a single log of a product of two fractions.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
, which is the product . Equivalently .
(d) How many diagonals does a hexagon have?
Show answerHide answer
Answer
9.
Why
Each of the 6 vertices joins to 3 non-adjacent vertices, and each diagonal is counted twice: .
The binomial theorem by induction
Theorem
Pascal’s identity and the binomial theoremPascal’s identity:
Binomial theorem:
Pascal’s identity is the key step: it combines the coefficients of from and .
Example 4
(a) Prove Pascal’s identity using the factorial formula.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Using :
Why
Use the common denominator . The first fraction needs a factor (since ) and the second needs (since ). The numerator becomes .
(b) Prove the binomial theorem by induction.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. The coefficient of for is by (a). The constant term is and the coefficient of is . Hence .
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. The coefficient of for is by (a). The constant term is and the coefficient of is . Hence .
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Write out a few terms rather than relying only on the sigma notation: the first sum gives the coefficients of and the second sum, shifted along by one power, gives the coefficients of from . The binomial theorem was used in Extension 1; this is where it is proved.
Example 5 · Induction with logarithms
Example 5
(a) Given , prove by induction that for positive : .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
The log law is applied with and . Then the assumption replaces .
(b) Prove by induction that for all integers : .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : , true.
Step 2. Assume the result for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume the result for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
The starting value is . Use . A non-induction method is to telescope using warm-up (c).
Example 6 · Induction in geometry
Think: when a new vertex is added between two neighbouring vertices, which new diagonals appear?
Example 6
Prove by induction that a convex polygon with sides has diagonals, for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : a triangle has 0 diagonals and .
Step 2. Assume a convex -gon has diagonals, for some integer .
Step 3. Add a vertex outside the edge to make a convex -gon. The new diagonals are joined to the vertices other than and , and the old side is now a diagonal: new diagonals.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume a convex -gon has diagonals, for some integer .
Step 3. Add a vertex outside the edge to make a convex -gon. The new diagonals are joined to the vertices other than and , and the old side is now a diagonal: new diagonals.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
In a geometry proof, Step 3 must say in words what the th step adds. Draw a hexagon becoming a heptagon: is adjacent only to and , so it makes diagonals to the other vertices, and stops being a side.
Exit ticket
A sequence is defined by and . Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : , so is true.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. . So is true when is true.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. . So is true when is true.
Step 4. True for , and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Substitute the assumption into the recursion. Do not use the formula for in Step 3, as that is what you are proving. Check: .