Warm-up
(a) For which positive integers is ?
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
, which needs for a positive integer, so . Check: gives , false; gives , true.
(b) Show that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Both sides equal .
Why
LHS: . RHS: .
(c) If and , what can you conclude?
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
A strict inequality followed by a non-strict one still gives a strict result. This is the idea behind the chain layout used in this lesson.
(d) Test for .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
True for , false for , true for . So claim .
Why
yes; no; no; no; yes; yes. The claim holds from on, so the first value of must be chosen with care.
Induction with inequalities
The set-out is the same four steps as before, but the inductive step is a chain of inequalities and each link must be justified.
Method
The inductive step for an inequality- Write the target: need .
- Write using , and apply the assumption.
- Prove separately that (expression in ) , usually a difference , using the first value.
- Chain: . is true whenever is true.
Watch out
Never start from the result you want and work backwards unless every step is reversible. Start from and build the chain towards . Also check small values: the first value of is not always 1.
Example 1
Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Let : .
Step 1. : . is true.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . The last step holds because for . is true whenever is true.
Step 4. By mathematical induction, for all integers .
Step 1. : . is true.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . The last step holds because for . is true whenever is true.
Step 4. By mathematical induction, for all integers .
Why
The assumption gives the first link. The “gap” is proved separately (Warm-up (b)), and it is where is used. Without a large enough the gap fails, for example at .
Example 2 · Factorials and powers
Set out each proof with all four steps.
(a) Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Write so the assumption can be used. The factor is at least 2, which turns into . Check: gives , false, which is why the base case is .
(b) Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Multiply the assumption by 3 (positive, so the inequality direction is preserved). The gap is . The base case gives equality, so the inequality is rather than .
HSC practice · A lemma first
Wording adapted from the paper.
2023 HSC Q13(b)
(i) Show that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
for .
Why
For both factors are non-negative: and .
(ii) Hence prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : . True.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Then . Need . Now by (i), so .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Then . Need . Now by (i), so .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Part (i) is exactly the gap between and the target . Look for the given result inside the inductive step.
HSC practice · Powers and factorials
Wording adapted from the papers.
Question A
2021 HSC Q12(d)Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : and , so . True.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Split so the assumption can be used, then compare the factor with 2. This is where is needed. For the base case, , so .
Question B
2021 HSC Q15(d)Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : . True.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3.
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Replace both multipliers by the larger one, 3, so the bracket from the assumption appears. Then . A non-induction proof expands by the binomial theorem (Lesson 3).
HSC practice · A binomial coefficient
Wording adapted from the paper.
2024 HSC Q14(b)Prove by induction that for all integers .
Hint: .
Hint: .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : . True.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. since .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
The hint comes from using the factorial formula; prove it first if it is not given. The ratio is less than 4, and keeps the inequality direction.
HSC practice · A sum
Wording adapted from the paper.
2020 HSC Q14(c)Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : . True.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. . Need this to be at most . Now so .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. . Need this to be at most . Now so .
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
Add the next term to the assumption, then compare with the target by looking at the difference. Since , we have . Non-induction alternative: , which telescopes.
Example 3 · A sum with square roots
Prove by induction that for all integers .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Step 1. : LHS .
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . Now because, multiplying by , this is equivalent to , that is , which is true.
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Step 2. Assume for some integer .
Step 3. Need . Now because, multiplying by , this is equivalent to , that is , which is true.
Step 4. True for and true for , so true for all integers by induction.
Why
The gap inequality is a small separate problem. It is safe to multiply by because it is positive, and every step is reversible, so the gap inequality really does follow from the true statement (as ).
Spot the flaw · An induction inequality
A student wrote this. Find the flaw, explain why it matters, then write a correct version.
Claim
for all integers .
- : , true.
- Assume . Then .
- Also , so . Hence true for all .
Task Find the flaw, explain why it matters, then write a correct version.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Flaw: line 3 is not justified. , which is only for (: ; : ). The claim is also false for (, , ).
Correct version: Example 1. Start at () and prove the gap step for .
Correct version: Example 1. Start at () and prove the gap step for .
Why
Prove the “gap” inequality for every the step needs, and test small cases before choosing the first value.
Exit ticket
For the inequality :
(a) Find the smallest positive integer for which it is true (and so the correct base case).
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
: false. : false. : true.
(b) Assume for some integer . Write only the inductive step (Step 3) as a chain of inequalities.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Why
The gap is . Each link is justified: the first by the assumption, the second because .